Skip to Content

Preparing Your Budget

Below please find several resources for getting started on your proposal budget. The budget guide below serves as a tool to assist in determining how costs should be budgeted and why.

Training Guide: Preparing Research Proposal Budgets at Texas State University

Expand or Collapse all.
  • The basic considerations for determining the allowability of costs are:

    • Costs must be reasonable. This is defined as the action a prudent person would have taken under the circumstances.

    • Costs must be allocable to sponsored agreements under the principles and methods described in the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards issued by the Office of Management and Budget (Uniform Guidance). Costs are incurred to benefit the specific sponsored project and able to be assigned to the project with a high degree of accuracy.

    • Costs must be given consistent treatment through the application of generally accepted accounting principles appropriate to the circumstances. Similar costs are normally treated as either Direct or Indirect across the University.

    Generally Allowable Costs (for full list see 2 CFR 200 Cost Principles)

    The primary source for identifying costs which may be charged to grants, contracts, and other agreements is the Uniform Guidance (link is external) prepared by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The document identifies costs that may be charged to these agreements and further clarifies which of those costs may be charged as direct costs and which may be charged as indirect costs. While not all of the projects sponsored at Texas State are federally funded, and while not all sponsors allow the inclusion of indirect costs in a project budget, the distinction between direct and indirect costs must be maintained consistently throughout the University.

    Not every cost associated with a project may be included in the budget. For example, entertainment costs are not allowable either as direct or F&A costs.

    Generally Unallowable Costs (for full list see 2 CFR 200 Cost Principles)

    A sponsor's program announcement may identify costs which cannot be included in the budget, although they would qualify as direct costs according to Uniform Guidance.Sponsors may also limit the dollar amount in certain budget categories. For example, limitations on salaries or minimums for participant costs may be set in place by the sponsor. Many federal agencies also limit payment to individual consultants.

    For either Indirect (F&A) costs or direct costs, the federal government identifies specific activities or transactions that are not allowed to be charged to sponsored research, either as a direct cost or an F&A cost. The following costs have been specifically identified by the government as generally unallowable on government grants and contracts.

    The list below is not all-inclusive. Individual agency and program requirements may list other "unallowable" costs.

    • Advertising for general promotion of the University, including printed materials, promotional items, memorabilia, gifts, and souvenirs

    • Advertising for recruitment purposes that includes color or is excessive in size

    • Alcoholic beverages

    • Alumni or fundraising activities

    • Antiques

    • Bad debt write-offs

    • Charitable Contributions

    • Commencement expenses

    • Decorative objects for private offices

    • Entertainment

    • Fine/original art

    • Fines and penalties

    • First-class/business-class air travel differentials

    • Flowers

    • Gifts, prizes, and awards

    • Goods or services for personal use

    • Lobbying

    • Memberships in airline travel clubs

    • Memberships in civic, social, community organizations or country clubs

    • Faculty and exempt staff salary in excess of base rates paid by the institution.

    • Selling or marketing products or services of the University.

    • Social events

  • Types of Cost Share

    1. Mandatory: When cost sharing is “mandatory,” the requirement for cost sharing will be described in the application guidelines. If the sponsor is silent about cost sharing or states that cost sharing is “encouraged,” cost sharing is not considered to be mandatory. For mandatory cost sharing the sponsor may require a certain percentage/type of cost sharing or that applicants “match” the sponsor’s contribution according to a certain formula. Any quantifiable cost sharing described in the proposal then becomes a condition of the award thereby requiring the monitoring and reporting of cost share expenditures to the sponsor.
    2. Voluntary Committed: Federal sponsors view any voluntary cost sharing offered at the proposal stage as “committed” cost sharing at the award stage. This means that any quantified cost sharing offered in a proposal that is submitted to a federal sponsor becomes fiscally and/or programmatically auditable and must be documented and reported to the federal sponsor if the proposal is funded.
    3. Voluntary Uncommitted: Voluntary uncommitted cost sharing refers to any effort or resources contributed to the sponsored project beyond that which is committed and budgeted for in a sponsored agreement. Such voluntary uncommitted cost sharing is not included in either the proposal budget or the narrative.

     

    Cost Sharing Mechanisms

    1. Waived Indirect Costs (F&A): When F&A is “waived” the University agrees not to charge its federally negotiated F&A rate to the sponsor. The portion waived is considered “unrecovered F&A” and can be used as cost share if this is allowed by the sponsor. AVPR approval also is required in such cases. PIs must work through ORSP to obtain approval to waive F&A.
    2. Contributed F&A: If allowed by the sponsor, the F&A associated with any cash contributions being made to the project by the University. For example, if the PI plans to contribute time and effort to the project without compensation from the sponsor, the monetary value of this effort as well as the F&A associated with it may be offered as cost sharing.
    3. Cash Cost Share: Contributing the computed value of the effort that University-paid personnel are expending on the project without reimbursement from the sponsor, direct costs paid by the University, to be spent on the project.
    4. Third Party Contributions: This is the computed value of any services and/or resources provided by a third-party in support of a sponsored project being administered by the University. Third-party in-kind contributions may be in the form of real property, equipment, supplies and other expendable property, or goods and services directly benefiting and specifically designated for the University’s project or program.

     

    Other Considerations

    • Always read the guidelines carefully for whether or not cost share is required, and if so, how much (1:1, 25% of the total project costs, etc.).
    • Federal grants must use non-federal money as cost share.
    • Items shown as cost share must generally be accounted for during the approved project period (not before or after) and only for that particular sponsored project (and no other projects).
    • Discuss possible sources of cost-share with your chair and/or dean.
    • All cost-share must be documented in the same manner as actual expenditures.
    • Documentation of cost share can be audited, just as expenditures paid for by the sponsor.
  • The budget justification is a categorical description of the proposed costs. Generally, it explains staffing and supply/service consumption patterns, the methods used to estimate/calculate (including escalation or inflation factors) and other details such as lists of items that make up the total costs for a category. The budget justification should address each of major cost categories (salaries, fringe benefits, equipment, travel, supplies, other direct costs and indirect costs), as well as any additional categories required by the sponsor.

    A thorough written justification that explains both the necessity and the basis for the proposed costs must accompany the budget. The justification section is critical as it enables the principal investigator to emphasize the importance of essential project costs. A budget that is adequately and appropriately justified is the best way to assure a positive cost analysis by the sponsor.

    Helpful Tips

    • When constructing a budget justification, follow the same order as that in the itemized budget or sponsor's budget form, so reviewers can easily compare the two documents.
    • Check to see if the sponsor limits the page length for the justification.
    • Be sure everything in your budget and budget justification is referenced in the proposal description/narrative as well—and be sure everything mentioned in your proposal description that would incur cost is explained in the budget and budget justification!
    • Double-check what expenses the sponsor will and will not allow, as these differ from sponsor to sponsor.
    • Remember, all costs must be reasonable, allowable, and allocable:
    • Allowable refers to costs that may be charged to a grant or contract.
    • Allocable refers to the ability to dispense and/or distribute group costs to grant projects based on the benefit to the program.
    • Reasonable refers to actions a prudent business person would employ.