Attachment I
Video
Documentation and Surveillance (VDS) Camera Installation Criteria
Purpose: This document provides
guidance to the director of University Police when considering locations and
addressing requests for placement of video documentation and surveillance (VDS)
cameras.
Potential VDS camera locations
generally fall into one of three groups:
A.
Type “A”
Locations Ideally Suited for Camera Placement. VDS cameras shall be optimally placed in these locations to
detect, deter, and obtain evidence of criminal or otherwise prohibited
behavior. Examples of such locations include:
1.
Primary, secondary, and service
entrances to buildings
2.
Inside elevator cabs
3.
Exterior building overviews
4.
Point-of-sale and cashiering
operations
5.
Vehicle and pedestrian entrances to
parking garages
6.
Parking lot and parking garage
overviews
B.
Type “B”
Locations Unsuitable for Camera Placement. VDS cameras
shall not be placed in these locations without prior review by the director of
University Police and written authorization from the vice president for Student
Affairs and the vice chancellor and general counsel of The Texas State
University System (TSUS). Examples of such locations include:
1.
Any installation for which the
primary intended use is the monitoring of employee performance.
2.
Any installation that would violate
an individual’s reasonable expectation of privacy, such as restrooms, showers,
dressing areas, areas used for clinical assessment or treatment of mental or
physical health, dorm rooms, private residences, individual offices and
conference rooms (with capacity under 50 individuals), or which would provide
recognizable or readable view of the contents of an individual’s computer
screen, etc.
3.
Third-party commercial banking
facilities (e.g., ATM’s) or similar locations for which the responsibility
clearly lies with the third-party.
C.
Type “C”
Locations that require review and authorization by the director
of UPD and by those responsible for the spaces that will be visible to VDS
cameras. Examples of such locations include:
1.
Locations used primarily for
instructional or research purposes (e.g., classrooms, laboratories, etc.)
2.
Critical infrastructure locations
(e.g., data centers, network switch locations, Co-Gen, pump stations, etc.)
3.
Locations housing hazardous
materials
4.
Warehouse, storage, and distribution
facilities
5.
Areas with large amounts of personal
property held by the university
6.
Large patron gathering locations
(e.g., coliseum, stadium, malls, theaters)
7.
Areas with a history of client or
patron disputes (e.g., Parking Services)
8.
Areas primarily occupied by minors
(e.g., Child Development Center)
9.
Any location that might present a
risk to university compliance with rules, standards, or requirements (e.g.,
NCAA, SACSCOC, etc.)
10. Any other area not clearly identified as a type “A” or type
“B” location as described above.
Camera Request Evaluation Criteria: The following criteria
shall be considered in responding to requests for VDS camera placement to
assure that all such placements are consistent with VDS policy.
1. What is the history of incidents at the location (at Texas
State or other institutions)?
2. What is the nature of the property at risk (value,
replacement difficulty, portability, desirability, controlled substance, etc.)?
3. What purpose would be served by the video documentation?
4.
How invasive would the requested cameras
be to users of the area in view?
5.
Can/should the requested cameras be
integrated with existing/planned security and emergency management technologies
(e.g., building access control and alarm systems)?
6.
What liability issues arise, if any,
from not installing the requested cameras?
7.
If the camera is intended to serve
multiple purposes, how compatible are those purposes (e.g., security, process
auditing, academic research, etc.)?
8.
Are there other and perhaps more
appropriate methods than camera placement for achieving the desired objectives?
9.
Are there cost control or avoidance
benefits that derive from the camera’s placement (e.g., delegated monitoring of
cameras in multiple labs by a single individual)?